Ideology in the 21st Century

https://scrapbox.io/files/6595ff54a8350a00234a029f.jpg

https://gyazo.com/6099f2955db45a1a85ff1498988800f3

Three ideologies

Entrepreneurial entities that seek to use technology to free individuals from bureaucracy, group organization, and oppression

Believes that the evolution of general-purpose artificial intelligence and Singularity can solve the challenges facing humanity

Diverse, dispersed communities peacefully coexist to enhance collaboration

It's no surprise that Synthetic Technocracy is more than half of the population since they "believe that the evolution of general-purpose artificial intelligence and Singularity can solve the challenges facing humanity."

When I thought about how the other two were allocated, I thought growth was more important than avoiding an existential crisis.

I believe that if earth civilization is the most developed option and homo sapiens civilization needs to be destroyed, it should be destroyed.

Perhaps the optimal solution is the path that doesn't destroy Homo sapiens, but it's not up to Homo sapiens to decide what the optimal solution is.

If a being smarter than Homo sapiens decides that the optimal Homo sapiens population is 100 million, then it's right to do so.

Well, it won't be a radical "let's kill billions of people right now", because that would easily be met with a backlash from homo sapiens.

I'm sure they'll make sure that homo sapiens actively choose "not to populate".

As for economic equality, I'm in favor of creating a minimum floor at UBI, but not a ceiling.

Against multi-person cooperation, since being multi-person is not the goal, but only chosen when it is beneficial to be multi-person, so "economic rationality" on the left side is closer.

I'm starting to think it's 5:4:1 or 5:5:0 instead of 5:3:2.

https://gyazo.com/286a10a47a952836024436cd875f352c

Discussion in Japan

relevance

---